In the whole interview Kepka did not say a word about dance. It is like in mass media, where names of dancers hardly ever make it to the leads of articles covering the awards and dance laureates should feel lucky enough to be featured in the list of award winners. Exceptionally, some female dancers wear extravagant dresses that later appear in flashy pictures serving as illustration photos.
Neglecting dance in (public) media became the main concern of Daniela Machová’s column published following last year’s Thalia Awards ceremony. The present case is even sadder. The interview covered almost everything, including contemplations on the reputation of the Thalia Awards. Though much in the Awards policy can be reproached (especially chronic ignoring of independent theatres), they still have their prestige in the dance world, maybe even greater than in the field of drama. It is regrettable that one whole category, a specific genre. is ignored not only by a culture editor, but also by the director of the Actors’ Association which presents the Awards.
I often observe how people who are not regular or keen theatregoers feel suspicious about dance performances. Afraid of not being able to understand them (and hence enjoy them) they rather don’t buy tickets for dance performances at all, they don’t even try. But how can this barrier of fear be broken if dance events are covered almost exclusively by specialised media?
More columns to be found HERE.
Josef Bartos
Thank you for your thoughts. One got stuck in my mind – that passion makes us different from AI. Just yesterday I read…I am a dance critic. I am a member of an endangered species