
Long before the start of the rehearsal process, we knew the theme and the very content of the show. Therefore, we wanted to choose actors and dancers for the project who would be able to sustain such a topic. It was also important for us to see new people. 500 dancers enrolled for the project, but for the actual audition we invited only 100. Nobody likes auditions and we also do not, but this is a great test / a test to show in a short time their creative potential, to be themselves. Being oneself is not easy, especially when you are required a lot of things in a short time. In any case, it was an excellent experience. We saw a lot of talented people. How far was it different then working with a freshly made group from creating for a relatively stable membership base? What are the advantages and disadvantages this situation brought?
Every situation and grouping brings its own advantages to be learned and developed. Cons need not to be even remembered. Whether it is a permanent group, or a new cluster, it does not matter. We have always known how to enjoy each creation of new performances. When we create, we do not suffer. To create a piece with a group of talented, hard-working performers is a great experience. You create, speculate, you play, you are serious, then play again, you are bored, suddenly inspired, putting pieces together and apart again. In each meeting, you meet a new world and new ideas about who you are and what you do. Every person who gives you the opportunity to once again look at your models of perception gives you the opportunity to evolve and develop a context in which we articulate our knowledge. Thanks to the others we are what we are.
The only challenge is to keep an international team together for a longer period. Not only you are a choreographic tandem, you are married as well. How do you manage to balance these two positions? Do you bring work home, and vice versa "private stuff” to the studio? How do you complement each other in choreographic work?
